The Dark Side of College Admissions: How Legacy Preferences Perpetuate Inequality

The college admissions scandal highlighted the need for reform in the higher education system. But the persistence of legacy admissions is a reminder that there is still much work to be done. This article explores the problem of legacy admissions and the need for reform.
The Dark Side of College Admissions: How Legacy Preferences Perpetuate Inequality
Photo by Annie Spratt on Unsplash

The Dark Side of College Admissions: How Legacy Preferences Perpetuate Inequality

The college admissions scandal of 2019 exposed the dark underbelly of the higher education system in the United States. Wealthy families were found to have paid millions of dollars in bribes to secure spots for their children at top universities. But while the scandal sparked outrage and calls for reform, it also highlighted a more insidious problem: legacy admissions.

Legacy admissions, which give preference to applicants who have a family member who attended the university, have been a long-standing practice in American higher education. But critics argue that they perpetuate inequality and undermine the meritocratic principles that are supposed to guide college admissions.

The Problem with Legacy Admissions

Legacy admissions are often justified as a way to reward loyal alumni and encourage donations to the university. But the evidence suggests that they have little impact on alumni giving. A study by the Century Foundation found that there is no statistically significant evidence that legacy preferences impact total alumni giving.

Instead, legacy admissions tend to benefit wealthy, white applicants who already have a leg up in the college admissions process. According to Stanford Magazine, the percentage of alumni children admitted to Stanford is roughly three times the overall percentage of acceptance. This means that legacy applicants are more likely to be accepted to top universities, even if they are not the most qualified.

The Impact on Marginalized Groups

The impact of legacy admissions on marginalized groups is particularly pernicious. When legacy applicants are given preference, it means that students from underrepresented backgrounds are less likely to be accepted. This perpetuates the existing inequalities in higher education and makes it even harder for students from low-income backgrounds to access top universities.

According to the Institute for Higher Education Policy, at selective universities without legacy preferences, 14% of the undergraduate class was black, compared to 11% at institutions considering legacy status. This means that legacy admissions are effectively acting as a form of affirmative action for rich, white applicants.

The Need for Reform

The college admissions scandal highlighted the need for reform in the higher education system. But the persistence of legacy admissions is a reminder that there is still much work to be done. Eliminating legacy admissions is a necessary step towards creating a more equitable and meritocratic college admissions process.

As the American higher education system continues to evolve, it is time to rethink the role of legacy admissions. By prioritizing merit and potential over family connections, we can create a more just and equitable system that rewards hard work and talent, rather than privilege and wealth.

Photo by Unsplash

The Future of College Admissions

The future of college admissions is uncertain, but one thing is clear: the status quo is no longer acceptable. By eliminating legacy admissions and prioritizing merit and potential, we can create a more just and equitable system that rewards hard work and talent, rather than privilege and wealth.

As we move forward, it is time to rethink the role of legacy admissions and prioritize the values of meritocracy and equality. Only then can we create a college admissions process that truly rewards the most qualified and talented applicants, regardless of their background or family connections.

Photo by Unsplash

Conclusion

The college admissions scandal highlighted the need for reform in the higher education system. But the persistence of legacy admissions is a reminder that there is still much work to be done. By eliminating legacy admissions and prioritizing merit and potential, we can create a more just and equitable system that rewards hard work and talent, rather than privilege and wealth.

It is time to rethink the role of legacy admissions and prioritize the values of meritocracy and equality. Only then can we create a college admissions process that truly rewards the most qualified and talented applicants, regardless of their background or family connections.